You can cut recruitment costs by shifting spend from job boards and agencies into AI-powered recruitment marketing that eliminates waste, improves targeting, and delivers stronger ROI.
Recruitment budgets are under scrutiny. Leaders want better results with less spend. But the old fixes of cutting job board packages or squeezing agencies, only reduce short-term cost. They don’t solve the underlying problem: wasted budget on channels that don’t perform. If you need to see the performance differences clearly, check Gaia vs Adway.
Employers face job boards delivering fewer quality candidates, agency fees eating into budgets, and pressure to prove ROI on every hire. The outcome is predictable: rising cost per hire and hiring managers still unhappy with pipelines. Our resource No in-house team, no problem explains how even lean teams shift budget into AI-driven campaigns without extra workload.
A recruitment marketing team in your pocket shifts spend into smarter campaigns. Gaia targets only high-fit candidates so budget isn’t wasted, optimises in real time to maximise performance, cuts reliance on agencies with scalable campaigns, and delivers measurable ROI through transparent reporting.
Employers using Gaia typically reduce cost per hire significantly, reallocate up to 70% of job board spend into AI-led campaigns, and gain clear ROI metrics to justify budgets. The key is not just saving money, but saving money while improving results.
“We cut agency spend dramatically while improving cost-per-hire.”
See the detail in the Babcock case study where they saved £80,000 with a £200 CPH and £23.45 CPA.
Cutting recruitment costs doesn’t mean cutting performance. With AI-led campaigns you can spend less without sacrificing candidate quality, prove ROI with transparent reporting, and free budget for other HR priorities.
If budget is tight, let’s find the quick wins first. Book a quick demo.
What’s the typical saving on job board spend?
Often 30–70% can be reallocated to AI-led campaigns.
How do you measure ROI?
Through conversion tracking, cost-per-hire metrics, and pipeline quality reporting.
Does lower cost mean lower quality?
No. Smarter targeting improves both cost and quality simultaneously.